Long-Term Immunomodulatory Impact of VNS on Peripheral Cytokine Profiles and Its Relationship with Clinical Response in Difficult-to-Treat Depression (DTD).

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) represents a long-term adjunctive treatment option in patients with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). Anti-inflammatory effects have been discussed as a key mechanism of action of VNS. However, long-term investigations in real-world patients are sparse. In this naturalistic observational study, we collected data on cytokines in peripheral blood in n = 6 patients (mean age 47.8) with DTD and VNS treatment at baseline and at 6 months follow-up. We have identified clusters of peripheral cytokines with a similar dynamic over the course of these 6 months using hierarchical clustering. We have investigated cytokine changes from baseline to 6 months as well as the relationship between the cytokine profile at 6 months and long-term response at 12 months. After 6 months of VNS, we observed significant correlations between cytokines (p < 0.05) within the identified three cytokine-pairs which were not present at baseline: IL(interleukin)-6 and IL-8; IL-1ß and TNF-α; IFN-α2 and IL-33. At 6 months, the levels of all the cytokines of interest had decreased (increased in non-responders) and were lower (5-534 fold) in responders to VNS than in non-responders: however, these results were not statistically significant. VNS-associated immunomodulation might play a role in long-term clinical response to VNS.

Longitudinal early epigenomic signatures inform molecular paths of therapy response and remission in depressed patients.

Introduction: The etiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) involves the interaction between genes and environment, including treatment. Early molecular signatures for treatment response and remission are relevant in a context of personalized medicine and stratification and reduce the time-to-decision. Therefore, we focused the analyses on patients that responded or remitted following a cognitive intervention of 8 weeks. Methods: We used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with MDD patients (N = 112) receiving a cognitive intervention. At baseline and 8 weeks, blood for DNA methylation (Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC 850k BeadChip) was collected, as well as MADRS. First, responders (N = 24; MADRS-reduction of at least 50%) were compared with non-responders (N = 60). Then, we performed longitudinal within-individual analyses, for response (N = 21) and for remission (N = 18; MADRS smaller or equal to 9 and higher than 9 at baseline), respectively, as well as patients with no change in MADRS over time. At 8 weeks the sample comprised 84 individuals; 73 patients had DNA methylation for both time-points. The RnBeads package (R) was used for data cleaning, quality control, and differential DNA-methylation (limma). The within-individual paired longitudinal analysis was performed using Welch's t-test. Subsequently gene-ontology (GO) pathway analyses were performed. Results: No CpG was genome-wide significant CpG (p < 5 × 10-8). The most significant CpG in the differential methylation analysis comparing response versus non-response was in the IQSEC1 gene (cg01601845; p = 1.53 × 10-6), linked to neurotransmission. The most significant GO-terms were linked to telomeres. The longitudinal response analysis returned 67 GO pathways with a p < 0.05. Two of the three most significant pathways were linked to sodium transport. The analysis for remission returned 46 GO terms with a p-value smaller than 0.05 with pathways linked to phosphatase regulation and synaptic functioning. The analysis with stable patients returned mainly GO-terms linked to basic cellular processes. Discussion: Our result suggest that DNA methylation can be suitable to capture early signs of treatment response and remission following a cognitive intervention in depression. Despite not being genome-wide significant, the CpG locations and GO-terms returned by our analysis comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment, are in line with prior knowledge on pathways and genes relevant for depression treatment and cognition. Our analysis provides new hypotheses for the understanding of how treatment for depression can act through DNA methylation and induce response and remission.

Lack of guidelines and translational knowledge is hindering the implementation of psychiatric genetic counseling and testing within Europe - A multi-professional survey study.

Genetic research has identified a large number of genetic variants, both rare and common, underlying neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and major psychiatric disorders. Currently, these findings are being translated into clinical practice. However, there is a lack of knowledge and guidelines for psychiatric genetic testing (PsychGT) and genetic counseling (PsychGC). The European Union-funded COST action EnGagE (CA17130) network was started to investigate the current implementation status of PsychGT and PsychGC across 35 participating European countries. Here, we present the results of a pan-European online survey in which we gathered the opinions, knowledge, and practices of a self-selected sample of professionals involved/interested in the field. We received answers from 181 respondents. The three main occupational categories were genetic counselor (21.0%), clinical geneticist (24.9%), and researcher (25.4%). Of all 181 respondents, 106 provide GC for any psychiatric disorder or NDD, corresponding to 58.6% of the whole group ranging from 43.2% in Central Eastern Europe to 66.1% in Western Europe. Overall, 65.2% of the respondents reported that genetic testing is offered to individuals with NDD, and 26.5% indicated the same for individuals with major psychiatric disorders. Only 22.1% of the respondents indicated that they have guidelines for PsychGT. Pharmacogenetic testing actionable for psychiatric disorders was offered by 15%. Interestingly, when genetic tests are fully covered by national health insurance, more genetic testing is provided for individuals with NDD but not those with major psychiatric disorders. Our qualitative analyses of responses highlight the lack of guidelines and knowledge on utilizing and using genetic tests and education and training as the major obstacles to implementation. Indeed, the existence of psychiatric genetic training courses was confirmed by only 11.6% of respondents. The question on the relevance of up-to-date education and training in psychiatric genetics on everyday related practice was highly relevant. We provide evidence that PsychGC and PsychGT are already in use across European countries, but there is a lack of guidelines and education. Harmonization of practice and development of guidelines for genetic counseling, testing, and training professionals would improve equality and access to quality care for individuals with psychiatric disorders within Europe.

Epigenetic modification related to cognitive changes during a cognitive training intervention in depression.

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation as a biomarker is well suited to investigate dynamic processes, such as symptom improvement. For this study we focus on epigenomic state or trait markers as early signatures of cognitive improvement in individuals receiving a cognitive intervention. We performed a first epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) on patients with cognitive dysfunction in depression comparing those with vs without cognitive dysfunction and those cognitively improving vs non-improving following a cognitive intervention. METHOD: Data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) were used for this analysis, where cognitive function of 112 patients randomly assigned to a personalized cognitive intervention was compared to standard cognitive treatment. Cognition was measured for this study using the four cognitive tasks from the THINC-it battery. We compared individuals with cognitive impairment with individuals without cognitive impairment at baseline and after a cognitive intervention of 8 weeks. Blood for DNA methylation analysis (Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC 850 k BeadChip) was collected at baseline and 8 weeks into the treatment. For the baseline analysis, after quality control, the final sample comprised 90 individuals, and analyses at week 8 were performed on 84 individuals. Data cleaning, quality control, and differential methylation analysis of DNA methylation data was performed using the RnBeads package (R). Analyses were corrected for gender, age, depression score (MADRS), reported years of education, height and weight, as well as surrogate variables estimated by the pipeline used. The within-individual paired longitudinal analysis was performed using Welch's t-test. RESULTS: Analyses at baseline and at week 8 did not show any genome-wide significant CpGs (p < 5 × 10-8) comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment. The most significant result in the baseline analysis comparing the groups with and without cognitive impairment at baseline is located in an open Sea region with predominantly regulatory qualities (cg10962945; 6.61 × 10-7). The most significant CpG at 8 weeks was also located in open sea, though in exon 13 of the NTRK2-gene, linked to the BDNF pathway (cg13620631, 5.56 × 10-7). Finally, a within-individual paired longitudinal analysis with only patients that show improved cognitive function over time was performed, showing 65 CpGs that overlapped between the 1% most significant of this analysis and the 1% most significant CpGs from the cross-sectional analysis at 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our result suggest that DNA methylation can be suitable to capture early signs of treatment response of a cognitive intervention in depression. In our layered approach we could capture dynamics that can help differentiate between biological trait and state markers of cognitive function in depression. Despite not being genome-wide significant, the CpG locations returned by our analysis comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment, are in line with prior knowledge on pathways and genes relevant for depression treatment and cognition.

Immune gene co-expression signatures implicated in occurence and persistence of cognitive dysfunction in depression.

Cognitive dysfunction contributes significantly to the burden caused by Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Yet, while compelling evidence suggests that different biological processes play a part in both MDD aetiology and the development of cognitive decline more generally, we only begin to understand the molecular underpinnings of depression-related cognitive impairment. Developments in psychometric assessments, molecular high-throughput methods and systems biology derived analysis strategies advance this endeavour. Here, we aim to identify gene expression signatures associated with cognitive dysfunction and cognitive improvement following therapy using RNA sequencing to analyze the whole blood-derived transcriptome of altogether 101 MDD patients who enrolled in the CERT-D study. The mRNA(Nova)Seq based transcriptome was analyzed from whole blood taken at baseline assessment, and patients' cognitive performance was measured twice at baseline and following eight weeks of therapy by means of the THINC integrated tool. Thirty-six patients showed comparatively low cognitive performance at baseline assessment, and 32 patients showed comparatively strong cognitive improvement following therapy. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using limma to a significance threshold of 0.05 and a logFC cutoff of |1.2|. Although we observed some indications for expression differences related to low cognitive performance and cognitive therapy response, signals did not withstand adjustment for multiple testing. Applying WGCNA, we retrieved altogether 25 modules of co-expressed genes and we used a combination of correlational and linear analyses to identify modules related to baseline cognitive performance and cognitive improvement following therapy. Three immune modules reflected distinct but interrelated immune processes (the yellow module: neutrophil-mediated immunity, the darkorange module: interferon signaling, the tan module: platelet activation), and higher expression of the yellow (r = -0.21, p < .05), the dark orange (r = 0.2, p < .05), and the tan (r = -0.23, p < .05) module correlated significantly negatively with patients' cognitive baseline performance. Patients' cognitive baseline performance was a significant predictor of the darkorange module (b = -0.039, p < .05) and the tan module's expression (b = 0.02, p < .05) and was close to becoming a significant predictor of the yellow module's expression (b = -0.02, p = .05). Furthermore, patients characterized by comparatively low cognitive performance at baseline showed significantly higher expression of the tan module when compared to all other patients F(1,97) = 4.32, p < .05, η= 0.04. Following eight weeks of treatment, we observed altogether significant improvement in patients' cognitive performance (b = 0.30, p < .001), and patients with comparatively high cognitive gain showed noticeably lower, but not significantly lower F(1,98) = 3.76, p = .058, expression of a dark turquoise module, which reflects complement and B-cell-associated immune processes. Noteworthy, the relation between cognitive performance and module expression remained observable after controlling for symptom severity and BMI, which partly accounted for variance in module expression. As such, our findings provide further evidence for the involvement of immune processes in MDD related cognitive dysfunction and they suggest that different immune processes contribute to the development and long-term persistence of cognitive dysfunction in the context of depression.

Digital tools for the assessment of pharmacological treatment for depressive disorder: State of the art.

Depression is an invalidating disorder, marked by phenotypic heterogeneity. Clinical assessments for treatment adjustments and data-collection for pharmacological research often rely on subjective representations of functioning. Better phenotyping through digital applications may add unseen information and facilitate disentangling the clinical characteristics and impact of depression and its pharmacological treatment in everyday life. Researchers, physicians, and patients benefit from well-understood digital phenotyping approaches to assess the treatment efficacy and side-effects. This review discusses the current possibilities and pitfalls of wearables and technology for the assessment of the pharmacological treatment of depression. Their applications in the whole spectrum of treatment for depression, including diagnosis, treatment of an episode, and monitoring of relapse risk and prevention are discussed. Multiple aspects are to be considered, including concerns that come with collecting sensitive data and health recordings. Also, privacy and trust are addressed. Available applications range from questionnaire-like apps to objective assessment of behavioural patterns and promises in handling suicidality. Nonetheless, interpretation and integration of this high-resolution information with other phenotyping levels, remains challenging. This review provides a state-of-the-art description of wearables and technology in digital phenotyping for monitoring pharmacological treatment in depression, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of its application in clinical trials and research.

Gene-environment interaction: New insights into perceived parenting and social anxiety among adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Social anxiety symptoms (SAS) are among the most common mental health problems during adolescence, and it has been shown that parenting influences the adolescent's level of social anxiety. In addition, it is now widely assumed that most mental health problems, including social anxiety, originate from a complex interplay between genes and environment. However, to date, gene-environment (G × E) interactions studies in the field of social anxiety remain limited. In this study, we have examined how 274 genes involved in different neurotransmission pathways interact with five aspects of perceived parenting as environmental exposure (i.e., support, proactive control, psychological control, punitive control, and harsh punitive control) to affect SAS during adolescence. METHODS: We have applied an analytical technique that allows studying genetic information at the gene level, by aggregating data from multiple single-nucleotide-polymorphisms within the same gene and by taking into account the linkage disequilibrium structure of the gene. All participants were part of the STRATEGIES cohort of 948 Flemish adolescents (mean age = 13.7), a population-based study on the development of problem behaviors in adolescence. Relevant genes were preselected based on prior findings and neurotransmitter-related functional protein networks. RESULTS: The results suggest that genes involved in glutamate (SLC1A1), glutathione neurotransmission (GSTZ1), and oxidative stress (CALCRL), in association with harsh punitive parenting, may contribute to social anxiety in adolescence. Isolated polymorphisms in these genes have been related to anxiety and related disorders in earlier work.Conclusions: Taken together, these findings provide new insights into possible biological pathways and environmental risk factors involved in the etiology of social anxiety symptoms' development. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings provide new insights into possible biological pathways and environmental risk factors involved in the etiology of social anxiety symptoms' development.

A SNP, Gene, and Polygenic Risk Score Approach of Oxytocin-Vasopressin Genes in Adolescents' Loneliness.

Not much is known regarding underlying biological pathways to adolescents' loneliness. Insight in underlying molecular mechanisms could inform intervention efforts aimed at reducing loneliness. Using latent growth curve modeling, baseline levels and development of loneliness were studied in two longitudinal adolescent samples. Genes (OXTR, OXT, AVPR1A, AVPR1B) were examined using SNP-based, gene-based, and polygenic risk score (PRS) approaches. In both samples, SNP- and gene-based tests showed involvement of the OXTR gene in development of loneliness, though, significance levels did not survive correction for multiple testing. The PRS approach provided no evidence for relations with loneliness. We recommend alternative phenotyping methods, including environmental factors, to consider epigenetic studies, and to examine possible endophenotypes in relation to adolescents' loneliness.

Parenting Interacts with Oxytocin Polymorphisms to Predict Adolescent Social Anxiety Symptom Development: A Novel Polygenic Approach.

Guided by a developmental psychopathology framework, research has increasingly focused on the interplay of genetics and environment as a predictor of different forms of psychopathology, including social anxiety. In these efforts, the polygenic nature of complex phenotypes such as social anxiety is increasingly recognized, but studies applying polygenic approaches are still scarce. In this study, we applied Principal Covariates Regression as a novel approach to creating polygenic components for the oxytocin system, which has recently been put forward as particularly relevant to social anxiety. Participants were 978 adolescents (49.4% girls; Mage T1 = 13.8 years). Across 3 years, questionnaires were used to assess adolescent social anxiety symptoms and multi-informant reports of parental psychological control and autonomy support. All adolescents were genotyped for 223 oxytocin single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 14 genes. Using Principal Covariates Regression, these SNPs could be reduced to five polygenic components. Four components reflected the underlying linkage disequilibrium and ancestry structure, whereas the fifth component, which consisted of small contributions of many SNPs across multiple genes, was strongly positively associated with adolescent social anxiety symptoms, pointing to an index of genetic risk. Moreover, significant interactions were found with this polygenic component and the environmental variables of interest. Specifically, adolescents who scored high on this polygenic component and experienced less adequate parenting (i.e., high psychological control or low autonomy support) showed the highest levels of social anxiety. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of individual-by-environment models.

Gene-based interaction analysis shows GABAergic genes interacting with parenting in adolescent depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Most gene-environment interaction studies (G × E) have focused on single candidate genes. This approach is criticized for its expectations of large effect sizes and occurrence of spurious results. We describe an approach that accounts for the polygenic nature of most psychiatric phenotypes and reduces the risk of false-positive findings. We apply this method focusing on the role of perceived parental support, psychological control, and harsh punishment in depressive symptoms in adolescence. METHODS: Analyses were conducted on 982 adolescents of Caucasian origin (Mage (SD) = 13.78 (.94) years) genotyped for 4,947 SNPs in 263 genes, selected based on a literature survey. The Leuven Adolescent Perceived Parenting Scale (LAPPS) and the Parental Behavior Scale (PBS) were used to assess perceived parental psychological control, harsh punishment, and support. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was the outcome. We used gene-based testing taking into account linkage disequilibrium to identify genes containing SNPs exhibiting an interaction with environmental factors yielding a p-value per single gene. Significant results at the corrected p-value of p < 1.90 × 10-4 were examined in an independent replication sample of Dutch adolescents (N = 1354). RESULTS: Two genes showed evidence for interaction with perceived support: GABRR1 (p = 4.62 × 10-5 ) and GABRR2 (p = 9.05 × 10-6 ). No genes interacted significantly with psychological control or harsh punishment. Gene-based analysis was unable to confirm the interaction of GABRR1 or GABRR2 with support in the replication sample. However, for GABRR2, but not GABRR1, the correlation of the estimates between the two datasets was significant (r (46) = .32; p = .027) and a gene-based analysis of the combined datasets supported GABRR2 × support interaction (p = 1.63 × 10-4 ). CONCLUSIONS: We present a gene-based method for gene-environment interactions in a polygenic context and show that genes interact differently with particular aspects of parenting. This accentuates the importance of polygenic approaches and the need to accurately assess environmental exposure in G × E.